Position Papers Links:
Other Legislative Links:
1st Session
H. RES. 31
January 6, 2017

Mr. McKinley (for himself, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Nolan, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, Ms. Sánchez, Mr. LaMalfa, and Mr. Young of Alaska) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to restore service standards in effect as of July 1, 2012.
Whereas, on January 5, 2015, the United States Postal Service has implemented lower service standards to virtually eliminate overnight delivery of first class mail and periodicals, and further delay most other mail;
Whereas delayed mail negatively impacts businesses, hurts residents, rural communities and the economy, and drives customers away, resulting in lower revenue and worsens the Postal Service’s financial situation; and
Whereas robust service standards implemented by the United States Postal Service are essential to providing prompt and timely delivery of all mail: Online purchases, local newspapers, newsletters, bill payments, letters, invitations, packages, and medicines: Now, therefore, be it
That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to restore service standards in effect as of July 1, 2012.​
1st Session
S. 606
February 26, 2015

Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Schatz) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
To extend the right of appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board to certain employees of the United States Postal Service.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Postal Employee Appeal Rights Amendments Act of 2015.
Right of appeal to Merit Systems Protection Board
Section 1005(a)(4)(A)(ii)(I) of title 39, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
is an officer or employee of the Postal Service who—
is not represented by a bargaining representative recognized under section 1203; and
is in a supervisory, professional, technical, clerical, administrative, or managerial position covered by the Executive and Administrative Schedule; and
Postal Service Reform Act of 2016

This bill requires the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to establish a Postal Service Health Benefits Program within the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program to offer health benefits plans for U.S. Postal Service (USPS) employees, annuitant retirees, and their families at rates that reflect the cost of benefits provided solely to the USPS risk pool. To obtain or continue federal coverage, Medicare-eligible postal retirees must be enrolled in part A (Hospital Insurance) and part B (Supplementary Medical Insurance Benefits for Aged and Disabled) of title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act. Each plan must provide Medicare part D (Voluntary Prescription Drug Benefit Program) prescription drug benefits.
Postal retirees not previously enrolled in Medicare will be transitioned automatically into Medicare part B, with their premiums reduced by 75% in the first year, 50% in the second year, and 25% in the third year, after which they will pay the full premium.
The USPS's annual prefunding payments to the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund must be recomputed each year based on economic and actuarial methods to liquidate 100% of the USPS's actuarial liability by September 30, 2055. The bill cancels the unpaid final 6 of 10 prefunding payments that the USPS was obligated to pay into the fund from August 1, 2012, to September 30, 2016.
The OPM must use postal-specific demographic and economic assumptions in its valuations of the USPS's Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) pension accounts. Under CSRS and FERS, any projected USPS funding surpluses shall be returned to the USPS through amortized annual installments.
This title reduces from nine to five the number of governors serving on the USPS Board of Governors with the Postmaster General and the Deputy Postmaster General. The USPS's power shall be vested in the governors and carried out by the Postmaster General consistent with the strategic direction and pricing and product strategy approved by the governors. The Postmaster General may delegate authority, but the bill removes the board's authority to delegate authority to the Postmaster General.
The USPS must transfer funds to the Department of State to coordinate and negotiate international postal rates and delivery services.
The USPS must provide mail delivery other than door delivery (with a preference for centralized delivery) for new delivery points. It must also begin converting to centralized delivery, curbside delivery, or sidewalk delivery for existing: (1) business delivery points, and (2) residential delivery points with postal patrons' consent.
This title: (1) revises the Postal Regulatory Commission's (PRC's) standards for establishing or revising rates or classifications for first-class mail, standard mail, or other market-dominant products; (2) repeals a rate preference that currently allows certain political committees to send third-class mail at the nonprofit organization rate; and (3) increases by 1 cent the postage rate for first-class stamps by reinstating 50% of the exigent rate surcharge for first-class mail and other market-dominant products that was in effect on April 9, 2016.
The USPS may establish a program to provide property and services on behalf of state, local, or tribal governments for noncommercial products and services at USPS facilities, and a program to provide property and services to other executive agencies and the Government Publishing Office, but only if such property and services provide a reasonable contribution to the institutional costs of the USPS.
In determining whether to close or consolidate a post office, the USPS must: (1) consider the availability of broadband Internet service and commercial mobile service in a geographic area, and (2) conduct a nonbinding survey to allow postal patrons to indicate their preferences among alternative postal service options.
The USPS is prohibited from offering postage-evidencing products or services that do not comply with regulations applicable to private companies.
The PRC must complete the initial review of the system for regulating rates and classes for market-dominant products such that a final rule for a revised or reapproved system is issued by January 1, 2018.
A Chief Innovation Officer is established to: (1) maximize USPS revenues, (2) utilize emerging information technologies, and (3) update an innovation strategy for postal and nonpostal products and services every three years.
The President must appoint an Inspector General of the Postal Community to consolidate the currently separate USPS and PRC inspectors general.
The right to appeal adverse personnel actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board is extended to nonsupervisory professional, technical, clerical, or administrative USPS employees who are not represented by a bargaining representative.
The USPS and the PRC must: (1) issue policies on contracting officer delegations of authority for postal contracts, (2) publish noncompetitive contract awards that exceed specified dollar amounts, (3) require contracting officers and decision-makers to disclose personal and business relationships that would cause questions regarding their impartiality, and (4) establish procedures for the ethics counsel to review conflict of interest disclosures to determine whether a contracting officer's participation would violate ethical conduct standards.
The USPS or the PRC may void postal contracts if: (1) there is a criminal conviction for bribery or a conflict of interest relating to the contract, or (2) the contractor fails to make required disclosures.
2/15/17 Congressmen re-introduce bill to expand MSPB Appeal Rights to Postal Managers.

Representatives Gerry Connolly (D-VA) and David McKinley introduced H.R. 942 the Postal Employees Appeal Rights Amendments Act to expand U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board appeals rights to mid-level U.S. Postal Service Management.
“This is about ensuring a fair review process. All Postal Service employees should have the basic right to appeal an adverse personnel action,” said Connolly, House Oversight and Government Reform Vice-Ranking Member. “Unfortunately, up until now, some mid-level managers have been left exposed without access to MSPB appeal rights. Our legislation seeks to remedy this unintended carve-out.”

“All Postal Service workers should have the right to appeal personnel decisions that will negatively impact them. Our legislation will create a fair process that will protect these employees from unjust decision making,” McKinley said. “This bipartisan reform will make government more efficient and I’m hopeful we can pass it through the House very soon,” said McKinley.
Despite the intent of Congress to confer appeal rights to most USPS management personnel, approximately 7,500 mid-level management employees within the U.S. Postal Service do not possess the right to appeal adverse personnel actions to the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. This has resulted in an inequity among USPS employees and created unnecessary costs, and in some cases, prevented the disclosure of fraud, waste, and abuse.

H.R. 942 would extend MSPB appeal rights over adverse personnel actions to any Postal Service employee who is a non-bargaining unit career and non-career employee in a supervisory, professional, technical, clerical, administrative, or managerial position covered by the Executive and Administrative Schedule; and has completed 1 year of current continuous service in the same or similar positions.
This legislation has also been included in the comprehensive Postal Service Reform Act, HR 756.
3/16/17 The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee approved H.R. 756, the Postal Reform Act of 2017 - "Question and Answers Below"

By voice vote the bipartisan bill would help to stabilize postal finances and ensure its operational viability. H.R. 756 was the subject of UPMA lobbying efforts during the association's Legislative Advocacy Days, on the last two days of February. At today's committee meeting, Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) and other committee members publicly thanked UPMA for its efforts in support of the measure. 

Five amendments, other than a technical amendment authored by Chaffetz, were offered at the committee meeting. The chairman and Ranking Member Elijah Cummings (D-MD) opposed all the amendments but one, since those amendments would have destroyed the careful balance so important to the bipartisan bill. 

Rep.Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA) offered an amendment to require the Postal service to notify the member of Congress of it intent to close or relocate a retail postal closing or relocation at least 10 days prior to notifying the general public. The amendment passed by voice vote, with the support for Chaffetz and Cummings. 

Rep. Darrel Issa offered four amendments; three were withdrawn, prior to a vote, and one was defeated on a voice vote. (Only Issa voted "yes".) The defeated amendment would have converted door-delivery to centralized if the Postal Service failed to break-even. Two of the withdrawn amendments also dealt with centralized delivery; the other withdrawn amendment amendment would have implemented 5-day mail delivery under certain circumstance. 

The next stops on the legislative trail are the House Ways and Means Committee, and the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Both committees have jurisdiction over the Medicare program and Medicare integration is a key element of HR 756. 

The committee also approved H.R. 760, legislation introduced by Reps. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) and David McKinley (R-WV), to enable the investment of a portion of the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund in index funds modeled after those established for Thrift Savings Fund investments.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS H.R. 756 The Postal Reform Act of 2017

1. Why am I paying less for Medicare Part B from my SS then my fellow retirees who only receive a federal retirement?

The Medicare law includes a hold harmless provision for annuitants receiving Social Security benefits in those years when the COLA non-existent or very low. This hold harmless provision also cover FERS annuitants, since they receive Social Security benefits; however, the Medicare law does not create such protection for those who do not receive Social Security, such as CSRS annuitants. UPMA has supported legislation introduced by Rep. Titus to provide the same hold harmless protection for ALL Medicare recipients. 

2. Will we be able to continue keep our chosen health plan

Inasmuch as there will be a postal-version of all FEHBP plans with 1,500 or more enrollees, the answer is yes. 

3. Will we be forced to take Medicare Part D?

The postal-FEHBP plan would continue to provide prescription drug benefits for Medicare-covered Postal Service annuitants and family, but through a Medicare Part D "employer group waiver plan." Therefore, FEHBP would continue to provide drug coverage, but the USPS would receive the subsidy for providing the coverage and covered-annuitants would benefit from a reduced FEHBP premium. You would not have to separately enroll in Part D.

4. It was always my understanding that if I was paying for one of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plans, I would not be penalize if I decided to enroll in Medicare after I turned 65?

That is incorrect, a late penalty is assessed if an individual enrolls in Medicare after the enrollment window closes, upon reaching the age of 65. Under current law, there is no FEHBP exemption. Under the proposed legislation, the late penalty would be waived for a finite period of time, 

Again I went to D.C. and did what was asked. I and Dave Cook visited our Congressman Tom Suozzi at the office in Huntington as well as in D.C. That does not change how we feel about the unanswered questions. I am enrolled in Medicare Part A & B. I was vested in SS in 1979. That was 30 years before I retired. I paid back my military time. I switched over to FERS the last time it was offered. I am still only receiving half of my SS.  

FEHBP-covered Postal retirees who are currently enrolled in Medicare would see that their premiums would be less than the FEHBP premiums of other federal retirees due to Medicare integration. Actuaries project about a 8-9% savings in the total premium. 

Trump Budget Targets Federal-Postal Community; Chaffetz to Exit Congress June 30
Posted by Bob Levi on 05/19/17

Early next week, the White House Office of Management and Budget will unveil President Trump’s detailed fiscal year 2018 budget proposal. According to press accounts, UPMA members should be prepared to actively communicate their strong objection to numerous provisions included in it. Among the most severe attacks are those directed against federal and postal retirement. The Trump Budget would:

Increase FERS employee contributions by 1 percentage point each year until it equals the employer contribution. This could be about a 6 percent increase in the employee contribution.
 Base future retirement benefits on the average of the highest 5 years of salary, rather than the current high-3
 Abolish COLAs for current and future FERS annuitants
 Reduce the CSRS COLA by 0.5 percent
 Eliminate supplemental payments for FERS retirees who leave service, beginning in calendar 2018.

On Thursday, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) announced that he will vacate his congressional seat on June 30. His departure may complicate House of Representatives consideration of HR 756, the Postal Reform Act of 2017. This the postal relief bill that he introduced with the ranking Democrat on the committee, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD).

Wednesday, July 19, 2017, 8:22 AM

Legislative News
House Budget Committee to Consider Federal Retirement Cuts. Tomorrow, the House Budget Committee will begin consideration of a budget resolution drafted by committee chair, Rep. Diane Black (R-TN). The proposal would, in part, increase federal and postal employee contributions for the Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS) and eliminate the supplemental retirement for FERS employees who retiree prior to Social Security eligibility. 
These two proposals are included in President Trump's fiscal year 2018 budget.
As was discussed at UPMA's February UPMA member retirement benefits is the congressional budget process -- more specifically, "budget reconciliation." Budget reconciliation is a vehicle buy which the Budget Committee assigns cuts to the committee with jurisdiction over certain federal programs. 

The House Budget Committee's just-released budget document instructs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, the House committee responsible for federal retirement, to come up with $32 billion in budget savings. This amount reflects a 6-year phase-in of a 6% increase in FERS contributions and the elimination of the FERS 
supplement. The budget document also contemplates the elimination of FERS. It also appears that the budget savings will be used to boost military spending and fund tax cuts.

UPMA members should contact their
members of Congress to oppose the federal and postal retirement hits.

House to Consider Cuts to Retirement and Health Benefits This Week
Posted by Bob Levi on 10/01/17

During the latter part of this week, the House of Representatives will vote on a budget bill (H.Con.Res. 71) that would, in part, require the Oversight and Government Reform Committee to slash postal and federal benefits by at least $
32 billion
 over the next decade. In addition, the budget bill would move the Postal Service on-budget and recommends enactment of Postal reform like H.R. 756, the Postal Reform Act of 2017. Meanwhile, the Senate Budget Committee will be considering a yet-to-be numbered budget bill that does not include any of these provisions.

The House proposed cuts are in the form of “reconciliation instructions” to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and targets federal and postal retirement and health benefits. Although H.Con.Res. 71 does not identify the specific cuts, the only programs within the jurisdiction of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee that would yield such cuts are retirement and health benefits. Consequently, increased retirement and FEHBP contributions, reduced retirement COLAs and benefits are all real possibilities. 

In addition, H.Con.Res. 71 calls for the reversal of a provision included in the Omnibus Reconciliation Act 0f 1989 that took the Postal Service off-budget. The existing statute means that postal revenue and expenses have not been part of the federal budget, and ensures that postal appropriations are not subject to automatic budget sequestration. The Postal Service’s only appropriation the year was $35 million, which reimbursed to the agency for overseas voting, nonprofit discounts and mail for the blind. Placing the USPS on-budget jeopardizes the nominal appropriation and could lead to greater congressional entanglement in postal policies.

Early this week, the FAIR Coalition – the association representing postal and federal employee and retiree groups – will be sending a letter asking members of the House to oppose any budget bill that contains “reconciliation instructions” to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and to convey their opposition to the House leadership. It is also crucial that UPMA members communicate UPMA’s strong opposition of the “reconciliation instructions” to their members of Congress. The U.S. Capitol switchboard number is 202-224-3121. 

President Trump Nominates Three to USPS Board of Governors
Posted by Bob Levi on 10/30/17

On October 26, President Donald Trump made three nominations to the U.S. Postal Service Board of Governors. Currently, the only two board members are Postmaster General Megan Brennan and Deputy Postmaster General Ron Stroman.

 The Trump nominees include former Postal Service Inspector General David Williams, former Republican National Committee Chairman Robert Duncan, and Pennsylvania businessman Calvin Tucker. David Williams has extensive postal experience in evaluating and making recommendations regarding postal operations and finances. Robert Duncan is a former Kentucky banker, and served as chairman of the Tennessee Valley Authority (a position held by former PMG Marvin Runyan) and chairman of American Crossroads PAC, a major GOP super-PAC. Calvin Tucker has been the CEO and held a number of executive positions in the financial industry, and co-hosted a Philadelphia-based talk-show. 

 The nominees will be referred to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. At the time of referral the committee will, in all likelihood, schedule prompt hearings, with committee full Senate consideration later this year.
PRC Finds Current Rate System Fails to Meet Objectives and Proposes Alternative
Posted by Bob Levi on 12/02/17

On December 1, the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) concluded that the postage rate-setting system created in the 2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act has failed to maintain the financial health of the USPS as intended in the law, has weakened the high quality service standards and has not increased pricing efficiency. In sum, the decade-old statutory postage rate regime has not met many of the the criteria outlined in the 2006 postal legislation. 

 As a result, on December 1, the PRC proposed three changes in the way postage rates will be adjusted, in the future, to improve the USPS finances and operations. First, the PRC would grant the USPS 2 percent of rate authority per class of mail above the consumer price index (CPI) for each of the next 5 years. Additionally, the USPS would be provided up to 1 percent of rate authority per class of mail per year, contingent on the USPS meeting or exceeding specified efficiency and service standards. Second, the PRC would require a minimum rate increase of 2 percent for postal products that do not cover their attributable costs. And, third, the PRC would establish two rate adjustmen bands for work-share discounts "pass-throughs." 

 The PRC has established a three-month comment period, ending on March 1, 2018. UPMA intends to contribute comments. No doubt this proposal will generate considerable debate within the broad postal community, particularly among the major mailers. Moreover, this proposal may encourage Congress to accelerate the legislative process with regard to consideration of HR 756. Indeed, PRC Commissioner Marc Action wrote in his supplementary comments to the PRC announcement:

 "The last few years have seen significant bipartisan efforts in Congress to craft such reform, and it has yet to come to fruition. The Commission does not have the ability to allow the Postal Service to re-amortize unfunded liabilities, administer employee benefits differently, change the frequency of delivery, or deliver profitable items restricted by statute. In short, there is no action the Commission can take to substitute for meaningful legislative reform, and I urge Congress to continue to work toward that goal."

White House FY 2019 Budget Hits Postal Employees and Retirees
Posted by Bob Levi on 02/12/18

Today, President Donald Trump submitted his $4.4 trillion fiscal year 2019 budget to Congress. While the budget projects a 2027 budget deficit of $450 billion, it still slashes over $155 billion from benefits upon which active and retired postal and federal employee rely. In part, the budget proposes to:
•More than triple the retirement contributions of most postal and federal employees
•Change the FEHBP employer contribution rate to encourage beneficiaries to enroll in health plans deemed to be "high-performing" and "high-value"
•Eliminate the FERS COLA 
•Reduce CSRS COLA by 0.5 percent
•Abolish the FERS retirement supplement for federal and postal employees who retiree prior to Social Security eligibility
•Replace the current annuity calculation of the highest 3 salary-earning years with the highest 5; and
•Dramatically reduce the yield on the Thrift Savings Plan's G-Fund investments.
The budget also proposes unspecified reforms to the Postal Service that includes changing postal rate-setting, modifying the mail delivery schedule and using more efficient delivery methods. In addition, the budget assumes that postal employees and retirees will suffer the same benefit cuts as all active and retired federal employees.  

 The upcoming UPMA Legislative Summit will provide a crucial opportunity for UPMA members to voice opposition to these proposals that adversely impact UPMA members